Evacuations from High-Risk Locations Call +44 (0)1202 308810 or Contact Us →

Election Guide

Thailand Elections Amid Political Crisis and Security Risks

Thailand Election Guide 2026 Solace Global Risk

Thailand Holds General Elections After Parliament Dissolution

On 8 February, Thai citizens will vote to elect members of the House of Representatives, the lower house of the National Assembly, following its dissolution in December 2025. 500 seats are up for election, with 400 chosen by constituency and the remaining 100 allocated to political parties in proportion to their nationwide vote share. 251 parliamentary votes are required to elect a prime minister, which is typically achieved through post-election coalition negotiations between multiple parties. The election must be certified within 60 days, by 9 April, and the parliament must convene within 15 days of election results being confirmed.

A referendum is also scheduled for the same day to determine whether to replace the current constitution, which was only enacted in 2017. Thailand’s Constitutional Court ruled in September 2025 that drafting a new constitution requires three referendums. The first would approve the initiation of the drafting process; the second would focus on the draft’s key principles and approach; the third would constitute final approval of the draft.

57 parties have registered to take part in the election, but three main parties will be the primary contenders: the ruling conservative Bhumjaithai Party (BJT), the progressive reformist People’s Party (PP), and the populist Pheu Thai Party (PTP). Incumbent Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is representing BJT. PP and PTP are the third incarnations of previous parties dissolved by the Thai courts for legal or technical breaches.

ASSESSMENT

Southern Insurgency Likely to Escalate During Thai Election Period

Thailand’s current constitution was adopted in 2017 following a political crisis, which led to the removal of Yingluck Shinawatra in a military coup in 2014. As it was drafted under a military junta, the current constitution was approved in a tightly controlled referendum and is viewed as granting excessive power to the Senate, which has the authority to approve the prime minister and members of numerous independent bodies, including the Thai Constitutional Court. Many Thais view the constitution as imposed rather than chosen and have demanded reforms.

The election is taking place amid a broader political crisis. The border dispute with Cambodia, which led to direct fighting in July and December 2025, triggered the expulsion of former Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra (niece of Yingluck and daughter of former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, both members of PTP or one of its predecessors) after she expressed deference to the Cambodian former leader Hun Sen and criticised the Thai military in a leaked phone call.

Her successor, Anutin Charnvirakul, who took power in September, has faced heavy criticism over his minority government’s handling of the flooding in southern Thailand in November, which left at least 176 people dead. Adding to this was PP’s pulling of support from the BJP and its looming vote of no confidence over its alleged failure to honour promises to reform the constitution, compelling Anutin to dissolve parliament and call a general election in December.

A coalition government is the expected outcome of the election, with no party likely to win an outright majority. According to recent polling by Suan Dusit, respondents to a 28 January poll backed BJP by 21.14 per cent, PP by 21.11 per cent, and PTP by 17.56 per cent. 23.85 per cent of respondents were “still undecided”, suggesting that there could be a large disparity in electoral results from the polling. In a 6-9 January poll, PP leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut was the top choice for prime minister for 31.99 per cent, with PTP leader Yodchanan Wongsawat second on 17.45 per cent, and the incumbent Anutin third on 15.14 per cent. However, BJP’s polling has likely been inflated by a surge in nationalism linked to the ongoing Thailand-Cambodia border dispute and could diminish in the lead-up to the election, should the current ceasefire continue to hold.

Despite its popularity in the polls, PP faces potential legal action from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) that could bar dozens of its members from running for attempting to amend Article 112 of the Criminal Code, Thailand’s royal insult (lèse-majesté) law, in 2021. The amendment sought to reduce penalties, narrow who could file complaints, and limit what constitutes an offence. While procedurally lawful within parliament, the proposal was later characterised by opponents as an abuse of office and an act undermining the constitutional order.

In the 2023 election, PP’s progenitor party, Move Forward, which openly campaigned on amending Article 112, won 151 seats in parliament, the most votes of any party, but was blocked from power by lawmakers tied to the royalist military due to its support for the amendment. Its prime ministerial candidate, Pita Limjaroenrat, was subsequently suspended from parliament and later barred from politics after Thailand’s Constitutional Court ruled that his candidacy violated electoral law, effectively preventing him from assuming office.

Since then, PP has moderated its position during this electoral campaign, dropping the call to change Article 112 and softening its stance on the military, which it previously wanted to drive out of politics. Even so, PP’s historical backing of the amendment almost certainly exposes the party to political pressure and, in extremis, potential bans from candidacy.

Should PP receive the most votes but be barred from candidacy, widespread protests are highly likely, as was observed in 2023. These would highly likely be led by the Thai youth, who make up a large part of the reformist parties’ support base. Previous bouts of major unrest mixed with institutional paralysis have triggered coups from Thailand’s powerful military on numerous occasions. This is unlikely to occur again in the short-term due to independent mechanisms typically now being preferred tools for managing political crises in Thailand in an effort to increase democratic legitimacy. However, if protests become widespread, violent, and sustained, with a political deadlock over the election winner, this would highly likely increase the risk of a coup.

Large-scale unrest is not the only potential physical risk likely to increase in Thailand during the electoral campaign. Thailand has been experiencing an ongoing separatist insurgency since 2004 in the southern provinces of Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, and parts of Songkhla. Insurgents have traditionally increased attacks during electoral cycles to undermine the central government and achieve maximum publicity for their cause. In 2023, insurgents set fire to cell phone towers and tyres across Yala, Pattani, and Narathiwat provinces. During the election periods in 2011 and 2014, insurgent activity increased around polling and campaigning phases, marked by attacks on infrastructure, local officials, and security forces.

On 11 January 2026, a series of coordinated bomb and arson attacks targeted PTT petrol stations across Thailand’s Deep South, injuring at least four. A member of the largest insurgent group, Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN), has since declared that the group is “likely to conduct attacks like arson, shootings and bombings to remind political parties of their demands” around the general election. Further attacks in the run-up to the election are likely, with incidents likely to be contained to the southern border provinces of Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat, and parts of Songkhla, and designed to generate publicity and exert political pressure, rather than cause mass casualties. However, attacks on Thai Buddhists, state officials, military personnel, police officers, and local Muslims perceived as cooperating with the authorities have increased in recent years, and there is a realistic possibility that more hardline elements of the insurgency will conduct more deadly attacks during the electoral period.


Election Guide

Costa Rica Election Focuses on Crime and Security

Costa Rica Election Guide 2026 Solace Global


Costa Rica Holds General Elections on 1 February

Costa Rica will hold general elections on 1 February to elect the president, the two vice presidents, and the 57 members of the Legislative Assembly. To be elected president, a candidate must secure at least 40 per cent of the vote in the first round. If that does not occur, the two candidates who received the most votes will compete in a run-off election on 5 April. If multiple candidates cross the 40 per cent threshold, the one who receives the most votes is elected president in the first round. Legislative Assembly seats are assigned via proportional representation across the country’s seven electoral districts.

Current polls indicate that Minister of National Planning and Economic Policy Laura Fernández Delgado is a clear favourite to win the first round. Polling from 21 January suggests she is approaching the critical 40 per cent mark, providing her with a realistic possibility of securing an outright first-round victory if current support levels are maintained. Fernández is running for the right-wing populist Sovereign People’s Party (PPSO), which was only founded in 2022. She also has the backing of incumbent President Rodrigo Chaves, who is currently an independent and barred from running for re-election.

Several candidates are competing for a possible second spot in the runoff, although they are all polling below double digits. They include: Álvaro Ramos Chaves, of the centrist National Liberation Party (PLN), Fabricio Alvarado, an Evangelical singer who heads the conservative New Republic Party (PNR), Claudia Dobles Camargo, the former first lady of Costa Rica who is supported by the centre-left National Democratic Agenda (AND) coalition, and Ariel Robles Barrantes, of the democratic socialist Broad Front (FA).

ASSESSMENT

Crime Surge and Mano Dura Proposals Shape Voter Sentiment

The elections occur at a time of increasing political turmoil in Costa Rica. President Chaves is currently involved in a conflict with the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) and has survived two attempts to strip his electoral immunity over suspected electoral violations. This instability was highlighted on 19 January, when the head of Costa Rica’s intelligence agency reported that it had received information about a plot to assassinate Chaves ahead of the vote, although the activist who was accused has denied the allegations and suggested they were politically motivated.  

Moreover, the crime rate has increased significantly, which has largely been attributed to the spread of transnational organised criminal groups since the late 2010s. In 2023, the murder rate reached 17.2 per 100,000, around 40 per cent higher than its previous peak in 2017. Increasing crime rates have resulted in growing public scepticism towards the political class. According to polls, large sections of the electorate have become disillusioned with the existing parties, with up to half of voters still undecided regarding their preferred candidate.

Law and order and the fight against corruption are highly likely to be the main issues during the electoral campaign, mirroring patterns observed in other Latin American states. In countries like Chile, Honduras, and Ecuador, leaders have increasingly responded to these concerns with promises to implement Mano Dura (“Iron Fist”) policies. Such policies have been characterised by mass detentions, increased police powers, and the curtailing of civil liberties. Mano Dura’s application by the government of El Salvador, which resulted in a sharp decrease in the violent crime rate, has become a model for other Latin American nations seeking to combat organised crime.

Fernández, expanding on Chaves’s positions, has pledged to implement Mano Dura in Costa Rica, vowing to build a “maxi-prison” like El Salvador’s CECOT facility, curtail civil rights in high-crime areas, and extradite Costa Ricans involved in organised crime to other countries, especially the US. These hardline stances, combined with Chaves’s enduring popularity (likely bolstered by the president’s clash with the legal “establishment”, have likely solidified Fernández’s primacy in the polls.

Still, Fernández’s victory, while highly likely due to the significant divisions within the opposition, is not certain. If the vote goes to a runoff, her competitor will almost certainly have an opportunity to unify at least part of this fragmented vote. However, the low levels of disillusionment within the electorate may make a significant swing in support between the two rounds unlikely.

Costa Rica has a long history of stable and peaceful political transitions. However, the country has had occasional waves of large-scale unrest, which have at times turned violent. The latest occurred in 2018, when labour unions staged a three-month strike over a proposed tax reform. The strike was marked by widespread and sometimes violent clashes between authorities and the protesters, as well as multiple incidents of vandalism.

It is unlikely that the upcoming vote itself will trigger large-scale violent unrest in Costa Rica. However, persistent political tensions, particularly the unresolved dispute between the executive and the TSE, could become catalysts for broader instability depending on the policies adopted by the incoming administration in its early months. The potential and controversial implementation of Mano Dura–style security measures is likely to result in significant division. While rising crime rates and the threats associated with transnational organised crime groups will almost certainly be leveraged to justify their implementation, for many, such draconian policies will likely be interpreted as a state overreach in a country that has traditionally championed democratic institutions and civil liberties, and which has historically been less affected by violent crime than many of its Central American neighbours.


Election Guide

Portugal Votes in Fragmented Presidential Election

Portugal election guide solace global


Portugal Heads to Presidential Polls With Runoff Likely

On 18 January, Portuguese citizens will vote to elect their new President for a five-year term. The winning candidate needs to obtain a majority of 50 per cent of votes plus one. If that fails to occur, then the two leading candidates will compete in a run-off vote on 8 February. The incumbent President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, in office since 2016, is constitutionally barred from seeking a third consecutive term.

Portugal is a semi-presidential republic, and the president, while mostly holding ceremonial responsibilities, has some tangible political power (unlike, for example, the heads of state of Italy and Germany). For example, the president has the authority to veto laws and appoints not only the prime minister, but also other members of government.

Eleven official candidates are contesting for the presidency. A first-round victory seems highly unlikely, and current polls indicate that only five of the candidates have a realistic possibility of progressing to the second round. André Ventura, the founder of the far-right nationalist party Chega! (CH) leads the polls with approximately 19.5 per cent support. Marques Mendes, the candidate of the governing centre-right Social Democrat Party (PSD), polls at 19 per cent. António José Seguro, of the Socialist Party (PS), has around 17.5 per cent support, as does Henrique Gouveia e Melo, an “outsider candidate” and former Chief of the Naval Staff who is running as an independent and has significant centre-right support. Finally, João Cotrim de Figueiredo, president of the Liberal Initiative (IL), polls at around 16.5 per cent.

ASSESSMENT

Portugal Far-Right Momentum Emerges as Key Election Variable

The elections are likely to be a crucial test for Chega that could accelerate the party’s political momentum. In May’s parliamentary elections, Chega won 22.8 per cent of the vote, improving on its 2024 result and becoming the main opposition force in parliament. On the other hand, Chega was generally seen as having underperformed at the October 2025 local elections, only winning in three municipalities.

Securing the presidency would almost certainly grant Chega significant leverage over the governing PSD-led coalition. A Chega president could threaten to weaponise presidential veto powers to extract significant legislative concessions and shift the parliament to the right, encouraging PSD to work more often with Chega.

Holding the presidential office for five years is also an important political asset at a time of extreme parliamentary instability in Portugal. The 2025 vote was the third in three years, and the current governing coalition only retains a parliamentary minority. Finally, Chega’s position is further reinforced by Portugal’s lack of a developed cordon sanitaire system; the informal agreement that, in the parliaments of other European countries, such as France and Germany, centrist parties unite to keep the far-right out of power.

Current polls indicate that Ventura is likely to reach the second round. In other European head-to-head electoral contests involving a far-right candidate (such as, for instance, the second round of the 2022 French presidential elections), supporters of rival parties have typically coalesced around the leading alternative candidate to deny a far-right victory. However, several of the presidential candidates are from the right of the political spectrum, and if the choice is between Chega and the Socialist Party, Ventura’s chances will likely markedly increase, with right-leaning voters, not affected by a cordon sanitaire, potentially opting for Chega to block the left. On the other hand, a centre-right candidate may have a greater chance of winning centre-left voters by positioning themselves as a “lesser of two evils” against the far-right.

While presidential elections in Portugal seldom result in protests, a (likely) second round involving Ventura, which raises the possibility of a Chega head of state, would likely become an important cause of public opposition. Chega’s growth in the polls has meant that party rallies have increasingly been met by large counterprotests. Occasionally, as during the April 2025 Revolution Day celebrations in Lisbon, these demonstrations have escalated into clashes between opposing groups.

Furthermore, the likelihood of civil unrest after the first round of the elections is further increased by recent political developments in Portugal. In December, Portugal experienced its largest general strike in a decade, which forced the government to amend a labour reform package that opponents said reduced workers’ rights. Before the protests, the reform, proposed by the PSD coalition, was widely expected to be approved by parliament with Chega’s support. Chega representatives later backtracked and called on the government to amend the legislation as protests gained significant traction. Emboldened by their recent success, labour unions may stage further demonstrations, particularly if the runoff appears to be “tilted to the right”, for example, in a Ventura-Mendes scenario.

While large-scale protests cannot be ruled out, especially in Lisbon, protests after the first round are likely to be mostly peaceful and smaller-scale. On the other hand, direct action by groups opposing Chega is likely. This may include vandalism, particularly targeting party premises and police and government offices, and possibly small-scale political violence, such as clashes involving opposing political activists.


Election Guide

Uganda Braces for Unrest Ahead of General Elections

Uganda election guide

Uganda Heads to the Polls Amid Heightened Security

On 15 January, Ugandans will take part in general elections to elect the president and members of parliament. The president will be elected in a two-round system, with candidates requiring at least 50 per cent of the vote to be elected in the first round. The 529 members of the Ugandan Parliament will be elected via a first-past-the-post system. 146 seats are reserved for women, with one seat per district, and 30 seats are indirectly filled via special electoral colleges. 

Uganda’s Electoral Commission has cleared 27 parties to participate. Eight presidential candidates are competing. The 81-year-old Incumbent President Yoweri Museveni was declared the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party’s candidate and is seeking to extend his rule, which has been ongoing since 1986, to a seventh term. Opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine of the National Unity Platform (NUP) is the primary opposition candidate.  

The lead-up to the elections has been characterised by intimidation, violence, and arrests targeting the opposition. Over 300 opposition supporters have been detained, with rallies being met by the police with tear gas, roadblocks, and arbitrary arrests. On 5 January 2026, Wine shared social media footage of security forces arresting and manhandling a journalist. This was the latest in a series of incidents involving heavy-handed tactics by security forces, typically against Wine supporters at his political rallies. Wine has claimed at least three deaths at his rallies at the hands of security forces, including one instance of a supporter being shot and another being hit by a military truck. In May 2025, Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Museveni’s son, who is likely being groomed as the next in line for the presidency, boasted of torturing Wine’s chief bodyguard. 

ASSESSMENT

Security Force Crackdowns Likely if Protests Erupt

Previous Ugandan elections have resulted in significant levels of violence. In November 2020, in the lead-up to the January 2021 general election, security forces arrested Wine, citing violations of COVID-19 protocols. Widespread protests erupted across Uganda, particularly in Kampala and other urban areas. Security forces cracked down on protests, deploying tear gas, rubber bullets, and live ammunition, and detaining approximately 3,000 people over the election period. 

In July 2024, young Ugandans engaged in anti-government protests in Kampala, largely inspired by similar youth-led movements in Kenya. Security forces quickly cracked down on demonstrations, detaining at least 100 protesters. Museveni, Africa’s third-longest-running leader, has cracked down on opposition in recent years, arresting and trying numerous opposition figures in military courts. Wine himself has been arrested multiple times since campaigning for the presidency, most recently in October 2023. 

A rising cost of living crisis, primarily driven by rising fuel and food costs, combined with perceptions of government corruption, has fuelled significant frustration among Uganda’s youth. If the election is perceived as unfree and unfair, or if the security forces use excessive or unwarranted force against the opposition, there is a realistic possibility that widespread unrest could break out. Security forces have historically cracked down on protesters with severe force and are highly likely to respond similarly to any unrest during the upcoming election. While the security crackdown acted as a deterrence to protesters in July 2024, Wine could act as a figurehead for post-election protests, potentially helping to sustain demonstrations despite the high likelihood of security force crackdowns. 

Despite the head of the Uganda Communications Commission’s (UCC) reassurance that reports of potential internet blackouts were “mere rumours”, internet blackouts are likely in the lead-up to the election. The government has already banned the sharing of live footage of riots, “unlawful processions”, and other violent incidents ahead of the election. Youth-led protests are generally heavily reliant on real-time updates, viral content, and livestreamed evidence of police brutality to sustain demonstrations. By cutting the internet, the government can disrupt protester coordination, prevent the documentation of abuses by security forces, isolate activists, and limit the spread of anti-government sentiment. During the 2021 election, during which widespread protests took place in Kampala, the internet was cut for four days.  

If civil unrest breaks out, demonstrations are likely around the Central Business District and near government buildings; during the July 2024 anti-corruption protests, groups marched through Kampala towards the parliament building but were blocked by the security forces. Large anti-government protests would highly likely result in travel disruptions, with security forces likely to use roadblocks to prevent protesters from accessing government buildings and diplomatic zones.  


Alert+

Thailand–Cambodia Border Clashes Resume

blue background

Renewed Fighting Erupts Along Thailand–Cambodia Border

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 15:00 GMT 10 DECEMBER 2025

On 7 December, border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia resumed, resulting in significant casualties and mass evacuations. Both countries dispute responsibility for initiating the latest clashes, with each side accusing the other of violating ceasefire agreements.

Cambodia’s defence ministry reported that nine civilians, including an infant, had been killed and 46 injured by Thai attacks. The Thai military said four of its soldiers had died and 68 were injured, while claiming dozens of Cambodian soldiers were also killed. Both sides have traded accusations of targeting civilians and using heavy weaponry. Cambodian officials have accused the Thai military of firing “toxic gas” into residential areas in Ou Beichoan in Banteay Meanchey province.

Both militaries have conducted cross-border attacks, with Thailand employing F-16 fighter jets in response to Cambodian rocket artillery fire. The Thai military also announced plans to demolish the Stung Meteuk bridge in Cambodia’s Pursat province, alleging it was being used to transport artillery, and ordered civilians to evacuate the area.

Chanthaburi is reportedly the only Thai province that has not been directly affected by armed clashes. On 9 December, Thai Navy marines launched a counter-offensive in Trat province to reclaim territory seized by Cambodian forces. Aerial images had allegedly shown Cambodia reinforcing the area with troops and weaponry.

Thai authorities reported that more than 170,000 people had been evacuated to shelters in border provinces, with additional reports of nearly 430,000 residents displaced since the fighting resumed. Cambodian authorities have reported that 101,229 people have been evacuated across five provinces.

Hospitals and schools on both sides of the border have faced closures due to the violence. The Thai military reported that Cambodian rockets landed near the Phanom Dong Rak Hospital in Surin on 10 December and accused Cambodia of deliberately targeting it.

Curfews and evacuation orders were imposed in Thailand’s Sa Kaeo, Surin, Sisaket, and Ubon Ratchathani provinces, with temporary shelters established for evacuees. The Thai government also heightened security and warned of suspected Cambodian spies in border areas. Land border crossings between the two countries have been suspended.

China and Malaysia urged restraint, while Thailand’s prime minister ruled out negotiations, insisting that Cambodia comply with Thai demands. Cambodia announced its withdrawal from the 2025 Southeast Asia Games in Thailand due to the ongoing conflict. The US has asked the two sides to “cease hostilities immediately” and follow de-escalatory measures outlined in the US-brokered October peace accord.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The dispute originates from a 1904 colonial-era agreement between France and Siam using the watershed principle to define the border, but a later French map placed the Preah Vihear Temple in Cambodia. The ICJ ultimately ruled in Cambodia’s favour. Tensions over the disputed region have occasionally escalated, most notably in 2008 and 2011 following armed skirmishes between Cambodian and Thai troops.

Tensions again reignited on 24 July 2025, with violence erupting along multiple border sectors. The two sides exchanged artillery, rocket fire, heavy weaponry, and airstrikes. Overall, the conflict displaced over 300,000 civilians across Thailand and Cambodia. Many villages, schools, and civilian buildings were damaged. On 28 July, both sides agreed to a ceasefire following Malaysia-mediated peace talks with added pressure from the US and China.

The US-brokered Kuala Lumpur Peace Accord was signed by both sides in October. Under the agreement, both sides committed to refrain from the threat or use of force, and to settle disputes peacefully under international law, withdraw heavy weapons from border zones, establish a monitoring mechanism, and demine and clear unexploded ordnance (UXO).

Further clashes are highly likely over the coming days. While the conflict has largely been confined to the border areas, the accusations of civilian targeting on each side, as well as accusations of the use of “toxic gas”, almost certainly heighten the risk of towns and cities further from the border being targeted. Furthermore, accusations of civilian targeting may result in tit-for-tat measures, such as the deliberate targeting of hospitals.

US President Donald Trump has declared that he will “make a phone call” to stop the clashes. It is highly likely that he will threaten further tariffs, which would almost certainly impact the economies of both countries and could act as a diplomatic off-ramp to engage in negotiations. There is a realistic possibility that protests will take place in Bangkok and Phnom Penh. Martial law may be imposed if tensions continue to escalate.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Thailand and Cambodia

  • Ensure that you contact and register with your local embassy or consulate if stranded in Thailand or Cambodia.
  • Avoid all military installations, government buildings, and key infrastructure, which may constitute potential targets.
  • Ensure you have robust evacuation, communication, and contingency plans in place.
  • Adhere to all instructions issued by authorities.
  • Expect the security situation in the region to remain highly unstable in the immediate future. There is an increased risk of further strikes and civil unrest.
  • Prepare an essential “go-bag” containing, at a minimum, travel documents, cash, medications, basic supplies, and communication devices in case of evacuation.
  • Keep emergency contact numbers saved on your phone, including those for local authorities, medical services, and consular assistance. Ensure mobile devices are fully charged in case of potential power outages.
  • Closely monitor trusted local news reports and government alerts. Unverified claims and disinformation will almost certainly be widely propagated on social media and unvetted sources.

Alert+

Honduras Election Raises Risk of Unrest

blue background

Honduras Braces for Unrest Ahead of Tight Presidential Vote

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 12:00 BST 28 NOVEMBER 2025

Honduras is scheduled to hold general elections on 30 November to elect the president, members of the National Congress and 20 members of the Central American Parliament.

The president will be determined by a one-round vote, in which the candidate with the most votes is elected to succeed incumbent President Xiomara Castro, who is constitutionally limited to a single term.

Current polling indicates that the presidency is a tightly contested race between Salvador Nasralla of the Liberal Party and Nasry Asfura of the National Party running neck-and-neck, while LIBRE’s Rixi Moncada trails in third place, suggesting no clear frontrunner.

Polling stations will open at 07:00 local time and close at 17:00. Voters who are still in line by closing time will be able to cast their ballots.

The vote-counting process can take weeks. In 2021, final vote tallies were published on 28 December, a month after the vote.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The elections are likely to cause protests in Honduras in the short term. This is due to the extreme polarisation of the Honduran political system. In the lead-up to the vote, several main parties have levied accusations of fraud and warned of foreign interference. The Attorney General has alleged that the opposition will attempt to manipulate the results, releasing, in late October, an audio recording that seems to suggest an agreement between National Party officials and senior military figures to claim victory before the official vote count is complete. Military leaders have also demanded to run a “parallel” vote count, which has almost certainly increased fears of institutional interference.

Previous elections have also resulted in widespread protests. In 2017, the vote led to almost a month of violent street clashes, curfews, mass arrests and almost 40 deaths after the opposition claimed there was widespread election fraud. In 2009, following the military ousting of President Manuel Zelaya, large-scale mobilisations paralysed parts of Tegucigalpa and other cities for weeks.​

Protests are likely to begin shortly after the vote count is completed and the results are announced. However, if any of the participating parties claim an “early” victory, this would highly likely increase the risk of large-scale unrest in the immediate term. Protests following the elections are likely to take place near government buildings and party offices. Large-scale unrest often coincides with road blockades on key highways, leading to severe traffic disruptions.

Honduras currently implements a “state of emergency”. It was issued in 2022 and is based on the “Mano Dura” anti-crime approach adopted by El Salvador. The state of emergency grants police significant powers to stop, search, and detain civilians. While aimed at combating organised crime, the state of emergency almost certainly increases the threat of a violent police response to all forms of unrest.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Honduras

  • Avoid all non-essential travel to central Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula on election day.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from security forces. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • Have emergency contact numbers saved on your phone. These should include the local authorities, medical facilities, and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • Closely monitor trusted local news reports and government alerts.

Alert+

Suspected Coup Attempt Reported in Guinea-Bissau

blue background

Guinea-Bissau President Arrested Amid Suspected Military Coup

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 15:45 BST 26 NOVEMBER 2025

On 26 November, President Umaro Sissoco Embaló announced that he had been placed under arrest at around noon while he was in his office at the presidential palace in the capital, Bissau. According to local media, the Chief and Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, General Biague Na Ntan and General Mamadou Touré, and the Minister of the Interior, Botché Candé, were also arrested.

The announcement came shortly after gunfire had been reported in Bissau, with reports stating that the gunshots originated from near the presidential palace. The gunfire lasted for approximately an hour, having stopped by 1400 local time. It is currently not clear who was involved in the gunfire, but an Embaló spokesperson has declared that the men were affiliated with opposition leader Fernando Dias da Costa. According to Embaló, no violence has been committed against him, and the army chief of staff had orchestrated the coup d’etat.

The arrest comes only a day before the results from the 23 November presidential election were set to be released. Tensions were high, with Embaló and leading challenger Dias both prematurely declaring victory on 24 November. Both parties stated that they exceeded the 50 per cent threshold required for victory, negating the requirement for a run-off vote. In a statement given in Bissau, Dias stated, “We have won the presidential race. We will not have a second round”. Campaign spokesperson for Embaló, Oscar Barbosa, announced only hours later that Embaló had won outright and called on challengers to avoid making claims that undermine the democratic process.

The situation in-country has been reported as calm following the earlier reports of gunfire. Several elements of the Presidential Guard are reportedly occupying strategic routes leading to the palace.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

Guinea-Bissau has grappled with chronic instability since achieving independence from Portugal in 1973, marked by repeated coups and ongoing political power struggles. The country has experienced at least 10 successful or attempted coups, making it one of the most coup-prone countries in Africa.

Political instability has increased following the postponement of the elections, with the opposition regarding Embaló as an illegitimate president, claiming that his mandate expired on 27 February 2025. The two main opposition parties had been largely excluded from the elections, including the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC), which led Guinea-Bissau’s fight for independence.

The arrest of Embaló is highly likely indicative of a falling out between the presidency and the military, which is likely due to Embaló’s attempts to centralise authority and reshape the country’s security services while marginalising his political opponents. This apparent coup attempt marks the second in recent months, coming not long after another alleged coup attempt took place on 31 October, resulting in the arrests of several senior army officers. It is highly likely that the military, which holds considerable political power in Guinea-Bissau, used Dias’ claim to victory as a pretext to conduct the arrest.

Former Prime Minister Domingos Simões Pereira has accused Embaló of simulating a coup so he could initiate a crackdown on the opposition. Dias’ claim of victory in the presidential election has highly likely provided Embaló with a pretext to portray him as attempting to forcefully take power. If simulated, Embaló will highly likely exploit the situation to arrest Dias and other opposition members.

Continued political instability is highly likely in the coming weeks. In the immediate days, the military will highly likely occupy key sites, including government buildings, media outlets, airports and border crossings, and critical infrastructure. It is highly likely that they will close the country’s borders and airspace, impose a curfew, and/or impose internet blocks while they attempt to re-establish order. Increased military checkpoints are highly likely on major routes and in the vicinity of government buildings and airports.

There will almost certainly be a heavy security presence in Bissau and other major cities in Guinea-Bissau over the coming days. The arrest of the Chief and Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces indicates that military factionalism is highly likely. Security forces will likely conduct further arrests of high-ranking individuals in the government and opposing factions within the military. There is a realistic possibility that military factions opposed to the army chief of staff will engage in armed resistance. A failed coup attempt in 1998, led by a dissident general, triggered a year-long civil war.

The apparent coup will almost certainly be perceived as exacerbating Guinea-Bissau’s political instability, and there is a realistic possibility that civil unrest breaks out in the coming weeks. After an alleged coup attempt in 2023 and the subsequent dissolution of parliament by Embaló, small-scale protests took place near the parliament building, with several people burning tyres. Guinea-Bissau’s security forces typically respond forcefully to protests, and the expected heavy security presence across the capital in the coming days will likely dissuade many from demonstrating. However, given the high tensions in the country following the dual victory claims, there is a realistic possibility that many will engage in rival protests.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Guinea-Bissau

  • Shelter in place until the situation becomes clearer.
  • Avoid all major government buildings, military barracks, universities, and police facilities.
  • Reassess travel to Guinea-Bissau.
  • If travel is necessary, allocate additional time for all road travel in Bissau and other major cities in Guinea-Bissau. Expect increased checkpoints by security forces.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support.
  • Ensure that mobile phones and other electronic devices are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of potential unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from security forces. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Protests Erupt in Bangladesh Ahead of Hasina Verdict

blue background

Violence and Protests Escalate Ahead of Hasina Verdict Announcement

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 11:00 BST 13 NOVEMBER 2025

On 13 November, Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal announced that it will issue a verdict in the case against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her top aides on 17 November. Hasina, who was ousted in the 2024 student-led July Revolution, is being tried in absentia (having escaped to India) for offences including crimes against humanity and murder, related to her conduct during the uprising.

Hasina’s party, the Awami League (AL), has called for a “lockdown” on 13 November, with marches in Dhaka and other major Bangladeshi cities. In response, authorities have significantly increased police presence across major cities, including by redirecting 14 border guard platoons to Dhaka and surrounding districts.

Several firebombings and detonations of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) occurred in the days leading up to the 13 November announcement. These included at least 17 IEDs being detonated at locations across Dhaka on 10 November, attacks targeting vehicles across the country on 12 November, and several firebombings targeting religious minority institutions, including the Catholic Cathedral in Dhaka and a Catholic-run school.

On 13 November, clashes broke out in Dhaka, where the AL office in the Gulistan area of the city was firebombed. Moreover, several attempted blockades of key roadways occurred on 13 November. At least one bus was set on fire on the Dhaka-Tangail highway. Authorities have stated that they have detained more than 50 AL supporters between 12 and 13 November.

Airports and other transport hubs have been placed on high alert. Several schools have switched to online teaching. Authorities have set up dozens of checkpoints across major roads and highways, particularly those leading to large cities.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

Violent civil unrest has increased significantly across Bangladesh in the aftermath of the July Revolution. Cases of large-scale mob violence, often led by local student political groups, have repeatedly coincided with important anniversaries of domestic and international events. Violence between opposing political parties, or even opposing factions within parties, is the most frequently reported. However, post-revolution violence has also disproportionately targeted local religious and ethnic minorities.

The ongoing unrest is highly likely to continue until the verdict is announced on 17 November and will highly likely continue in the immediate aftermath. The unrest will highly likely take the form of clashes between AL and other parties’ supporters – particularly those of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) – and between AL supporters and police. Opportunistic attacks on minority places of worship and other institutions remain likely during the unrest, as demonstrated by the recent firebombings on Catholic sites.

Focal points for protests will likely include universities, main public squares in large cities, and the vicinity of party headquarters. Protests in Bangladesh often coincide with road blockades, with protesters erecting improvised barricades and often attacking transiting vehicles. There is a realistic possibility of unrest near airports, which could cause flight delays or cancellations.

Bangladeshi police will likely respond to all unrest with violent crowd control methods. These include tear gas, baton charges, water cannons, and, in some cases, live ammunition. There is a realistic possibility that police actions will escalate unrest.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Bangladesh

  • Avoid all major government buildings, universities, and police facilities in Dhaka and other major cities. Avoid all places of worship throughout Bangladesh.
  • Avoid all travel to the Dhanmondi area of Dhaka, where the International Crimes Tribunal is located. Reconsider travel to central Dhaka.
  • Allocate additional time for all road travel in Bangladesh.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from authorities. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation. Adhere to curfews.
  • Ensure you have personal identification documents with you. If stopped at a police checkpoint, comply with all orders.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Suicide Blast Outside Islamabad Court

blue background

Explosion Outside Islamabad Court Kills at Least 12, Injures 27

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 11:00 BST 11 NOVEMBER 2025

On 11 November, at approximately 12:39 local time (07:39 UTC), an explosion occurred outside the District Judicial Court complex in Islamabad, Pakistan, located adjacent to Srinagar Highway in the G-11 sector of the city. The Interior Ministry has confirmed that at least 12 people were killed and at least 27 were injured in the explosion.

Footage reportedly showing the aftermath of the explosion shows a vehicle on fire on the service road outside the complex’s gates, as well as possible victims near the location of the blast. Authorities have established a security perimeter near the incident location and appear to have halted traffic on the nearby section of the Srinagar Highway.

Pakistani authorities have stated that they assess that the explosion was a terrorist attack perpetrated by an individual equipped with a person-borne improvised explosive device (PBIED, likely a suicide vest). Some unconfirmed testimonies state that the alleged attacker approached the complex on a motorcycle, while the Interior Ministry stated that he unsuccessfully attempted to enter the courthouse.

Law enforcement agencies have been placed on high alert to prevent or respond to any possible future attacks.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The attack comes a day after a vehicle explosion killed at least eight people near the Red Fort landmark in Delhi, India, although there is so far no evidence linking the two events.

Suicide bombings in Islamabad have been less common in recent years relative to other Pakistani urban centres. The city is Pakistan’s most securitised urban space, containing security checkpoints and fortified zones to prevent such attacks.

There is no official confirmation of the perpetrator’s affiliation. Pakistani media has accused “Fitna al-Khawarij”, a term often applied to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which primarily operates in regions next to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The group has claimed responsibility for numerous attacks in Pakistan’s major cities, including a 2014 attack on Jinnah International Airport in Karachi, a 2017 suicide bombing in Lahore, and a 2023 attack on a police headquarters in Karachi. The group has previously targeted Islamabad, attempting a suicide bombing in Islamabad’s government district in December 2022. In August 2025, Pakistan’s intelligence agency announced that it foiled a planned TTP suicide car bombing. Early assessment suggests that the TTP are the most likely perpetrators of the Islamabad District Judicial Court bombing, although there are multiple other terrorist threat actors present in Pakistan.

Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) has also claimed responsibility for numerous attacks in the country. PBIEDs are often used by the group; however, most of ISKP’s attacks have taken place in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and the group has not previously targeted Islamabad. The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) is also active in Balochistan, with typical targets including Pakistani security forces, infrastructure projects, and government installations in the Balochistan region.

The attack comes amid heightened tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Islamabad has frequently accused the Afghan Taliban-led government of allowing TTP militants safe havens across the border, from which attacks are launched into Pakistan. Recent tensions escalated into airstrikes conducted by Pakistan on TTP targets in Kabul on 15 October, following TTP raids on Pakistani military posts along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border that killed 11 on 11 October.

If confirmed to be TTP, already high tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan will highly likely further increase. There is a realistic possibility that Pakistan will conduct further cross-border strikes into Afghanistan targeting TTP hideouts. Additionally, Islamabad may suspend ongoing diplomatic engagement, fully close partially open border crossings, and/or impose further travel restrictions on Afghan nationals.

Islamabad has also frequently blamed New Delhi for supporting the TTP as a proxy to destabilise Pakistan, and Pakistani media have accused the perpetrators of the attack of being “India-backed”. There is a realistic possibility that protests will occur close to the High Commission of India in Islamabad, although demonstrations are generally restricted inside the diplomatic zone and are likely to be met with a heavy security presence.

A heightened security presence across major cities in Pakistan is highly likely, with increased security checkpoints and road closures. Heightened security will highly likely lead to increased travel disruptions in the short term. Intensified security operations in the border regions, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and/or Balochistan, are highly likely.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Islamabad

  • Closely monitor local news reports and government alerts.
  • Adhere to all instructions issued by authorities.
  • Limit travel to the G-11 sector of Islamabad.
  • Delays and increased traffic are likely to persist during the day on Srinagar Highway. Allocate additional time for all road movements in Islamabad.
  • Avoid all travel to the vicinity of government offices, diplomatic and military facilities, and police stations in Pakistan.
  • Heed any evacuation orders and travel to government-issued meeting points if ordered to do so.
  • Ensure you are carrying the necessary documents.
  • Prepare an emergency ‘go bag’ with essentials such as bottled water, batteries, important documents, and medications.
  • Consider alternative working arrangements (i.e. remote work) if possible.

Alert+

Explosion Near Delhi’s Red Fort

blue background

Delhi on High Alert After Deadly Blast Near Red Fort

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 15:30 BST 10 NOVEMBER 2025

At approximately 19:05 local time, 10 November, an explosion occurred near the Red Fort in a densely populated area of Delhi. At least eight people were killed and 12 others injured, according to hospital officials. Multiple casualties were brought to Lok Nayak (LNJP) Hospital.

The explosion appeared to take place inside a vehicle and set multiple other vehicles alight. Videos on social media show a large fire on a congested street close to the Red Fort metro station gate number one.

Delhi has been placed on high alert following the blast. An investigation is underway into the cause of the explosion. Police cordoned off the area, and several firefighting vehicles and ambulances were dispatched to the scene. The National Security Guard (NSG), the National Investigation Agency (NIA), formed after the 26/11 2008 Mumbai attacks, and the forensic department were also dispatched.

The Uttar Pradesh region bordering Delhi and Mumbai in the Maharashtra region have been placed on high alert. Instructions have reportedly been issued to all senior officials to increase security and patrols at sensitive religious sites, sensitive districts, and border areas. Security agencies have also been alerted, and the police have been put on alert.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force (DIG CRPF) has stated that it is “too early to say anything” regarding the cause of the explosion.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The Red Fort, also known as the Lal Qila, is a Mughal-era fort located in the old city and is a popular tourist destination with heavy foot traffic. The location of the blast in the area and near a traffic hub likely suggests that, if the explosion is terrorism-related, its perpetrators sought to maximise civilian casualties while also obtaining maximum visibility for their actions.

While a possible terrorist link has not been confirmed by authorities as of the time of reporting, the incident occurred only hours after two separate terror plots were reportedly thwarted by Indian authorities. On the night of 9-10 November, Indian police reported the arrest of seven individuals in Faridabad, part of the Delhi National Capital Region, who were reportedly found in possession of approximately 360 kilograms of explosive material and a “large cache of arms and ammunition”. Authorities reported that the suspects were linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), a separatist-Islamist group based in Kashmir.

On 9 November, three individuals were arrested in Gujarat and found in possession of several firearms and approximately 4 kilograms of ricin precursors. Indian authorities have suggested that they had had links with an Afghanistan-based operative of the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP). In late October, Indian authorities had already arrested two suspected ISKP-linked operatives for planning attacks in New Delhi on Diwali.

If the Red Fort blast is confirmed as terrorism, there is a realistic possibility that the attack is linked to the reported foiled plots, with the perpetrators seeking to quickly conduct an attack due to the increased threat of discovery. Moreover, confirmation of an act of terrorism, particularly if linked to JeM, would highly likely increase tensions between India and Pakistan.

Transport disruptions are highly likely following the blast, with potential closures to the metro and likely road closures in the area. Furthermore, there is highly likely to be a heightened security presence in Delhi and other major cities, with increased checkpoints.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Delhi

  • Closely monitor local news reports and government alerts.
  • Adhere to all instructions issued by authorities.
  • Avoid the Red Fort and the surrounding areas. Allocate additional time for all travel in the vicinity of the incident area.
  • Avoid travel on public transport and particularly on the Violet Line (which serves Lal Qila and is likely to be severely disrupted).
  • Heed evacuation orders and travel to government-issued meeting points if ordered to do so.
  • Ensure you are carrying the necessary documents.
  • Prepare an emergency ‘go bag’ with essentials such as bottled water, batteries, important documents, and medications.
  • Consider alternative working arrangements (i.e. remote work) if possible.

Alert+

Large-Scale Protests
Planned in Novi Sad

blue background

Serbia Braces for Mass Demonstrations Marking Novi Sad Tragedy

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 13:30 BST 31 OCTOBER 2025

1 November will be the first anniversary of the collapse of a railway station canopy in Novi Sad, Serbia, which killed 16 people. The incident sparked large-scale protests, which quickly expanded to other Serbian cities and evolved into a broader anti-government movement against perceived corruption. The protests are the largest in Serbia’s history, with one rally in March recording an attendance of more than 325,000 people in Belgrade alone.

On 31 October and 1 November, large-scale demonstrations are scheduled to take place in Novi Sad to mark the first anniversary of the incident. Student groups, who led the initial protests in 2024, have staged a march from Belgrade to Novi Sad, with approximately 6,000 people in attendance according to local media. Separate efforts have been undertaken by activist groups from other parts of Serbia and neighbouring countries to transport attendees to Novi Sad for the anniversary. Protesters are expected to congregate near Novi Sad station, on Bulevar Jaše Tomića.

The government of Aleksandar Vučić and its allies have opposed the protests, at times suggesting that they are an attempt to stage a “colour revolution” in Serbia under the direction of foreign powers; a reference to 21st century protests in post-Soviet states that precipitated changes of government. Some local media outlets have reported that an unspecified number of government supporters also plan to travel to Novi Sad to stage counterprotests on 31 October and 1 November.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

While the organisers of the march to Novi Sad have repeatedly reiterated their commitment to peaceful protest, the possibility of political violence on 31 October and 1 November cannot be ruled out. The past twelve months of anti-government protests have significantly deepened divisions in Serbia’s political landscape, and there have been repeated cases of targeted attacks against anti-government protesters during past demonstrations. Moreover, the anniversary falls only days after a shooting occurred outside the Serbian parliament, in an area where supporters of the president had erected an improvised “encampment”. The shooting injured one, and Vučić described it as a “terrorist attack”.

Should the protests turn violent, Serbian police are likely to use heavy-handed crowd control measures such as pepper spray, tear gas, stun grenades and water cannons. These tactics have previously intensified unrest, with their use during past demonstrations often provoking larger turnouts, escalating clashes, and fuelling public anger over perceived police brutality.

While the main rallying point for the demonstrators will be the vicinity of the Novi Sad train station, the protests are likely to create disruptions throughout the city’s centre. In past demonstrations, protesters blocked the city’s main bridges over the Danube, as well as the main roadways leading to and from the city. Even in the absence of violent unrest, the protests are likely to result in traffic disruptions in and around Novi Sad.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Serbia

  • Avoid all non-necessary travel to central Novi Sad on 31 October and 1 November.
  • Avoid travelling near Serbian government buildings, universities and local administrative facilities.
  • Expect longer police and ambulance response times on 31 October and 1 November.
  • Allocate additional time for all travel to and from Novi Sad and Belgrade.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of potential unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from security forces. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • Have emergency contact numbers saved on your phone. These should include local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged ahead of travel.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Protests in Peru Escalate
After Fatal Clashes in Lima

blue background

Unrest Spreads in Peru Following Killing of Protester in Lima

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 11:30 BST 17 OCTOBER 2025

Anti-government protests in Peru, which have been ongoing since 20 September, have escalated. The protests have targeted the government of President José Jerí, who assumed office following the impeachment of former President Dina Boluarte on 10 October. While primarily centred in Lima, protests have also occurred in Arequipa, Callao, Cusco, and Puno. Fishermen’s strikes and demonstrations have concurrently occurred in Lambayeque and Piura.

The demonstrations have been fuelled by widespread discontent over corruption, political instability, and high crime rates. The trigger was a law passed on 5 September requiring all Peruvians above the age of 18 to join a pension provider, despite widespread job insecurity.

On 15 October, thousands gathered in Lima, with hundreds clashing outside the Congress building. Security forces cracked down on demonstrations with tear gas, and numerous protesters and police officers were injured. The latest figures released by The Ombudsman’s Office reveal that at least 102 people were hospitalised due to injuries sustained during the clashes, with 78 of them being police officers.

One protester, identified as popular rapper Eduardo Ruiz, was killed in the clashes after being shot by security forces. The police have since identified the officer involved in the shooting and have detained and dismissed him from his job.

In response to the unrest, Prime Minister Ernesto Alvarez announced late 16 October that the government would imminently declare a state of emergency in Lima, with a curfew under consideration. President Jerí has faced mounting pressure, with at least 19 members of parliament signing a petition to initiate impeachment proceedings against him over the handling of the protests and the resulting violence. However, the motion requires at least 33 signatures to proceed. Despite the unrest, President Jerí has stated he will not resign, even as lawmakers rejected a censure of the board of directors he chairs.

Transportation workers in Lima and Callao have announced a three-minute road blockade on 17 October in a symbolic gesture to reject violence during the anti-government protests.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

Despite President Jerí announcing that the death of the protester would be “objectively investigated” and that they would face the “full force of the law”, the killing of Ruiz has almost certainly deepened anti-government sentiment and inflamed protests. This has been further exacerbated by President Jerí’s refusal to step down amid escalating pressure from Peru’s parliament.

The state of emergency will likely be imposed to quell civil unrest over the weekend. Previous bouts of civil unrest in the country, such as the December 2022 to March 2023 demonstrations against the removal of Former President Pedro Castillo from office, have led to the government imposing similar states of emergency.

Under the expanded powers, the government will highly likely deploy military forces, impose curfews, and conduct mass arrests. The state of emergency imposed in 2022 failed to deal with the civil unrest, instead resulting in alleged human rights abuses, such as the use of live ammunition against protesters and forced disappearances; protests continued for months, inflamed by the perceived excessive force used by security forces.

It is likely that a state of emergency resulting in harsher measures by security forces will exacerbate protests. Demonstrations are highly likely over the weekend and into next week.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Peru

  • Avoid all major government buildings, universities, and police facilities in Lima. Reassess travel to Peru.
  • Allocate additional time for all road travel in Lima and other urban centres in Peru.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from authorities. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation. Adhere to curfews.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Coup Attempt Reported in Madagascar

blue background

Madagascar Faces Political Crisis as Coup Attempt Unfolds

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 11:30 BST 12 OCTOBER 2025

On the morning of 12 October, multiple domestic and regional sources indicated that a potential coup was underway in Madagascar. At 09:10 local time, the Presidency of the Republic of Madagascar released a statement declaring, “An attempt to seize power illegally and by force, contrary to the Constitution and to democratic principles, is currently underway.”

Soon after, CAPSAT, an elite military unit that was instrumental during the 2009 political crisis in Madagascar and helped President Andry Rajoelina rise to power, released a video stating that the Madagascan Armed Forces (MAF) are now managed from their command centre. This effectively places operational control of the country’s armed forces under CAPSAT, with General Demosthène Pikulas reportedly appointed as head of the MAF.

The Malagasy National Gendarmerie also acknowledged certain abuses within its ranks during the anti-government protest and declared that all orders will now come solely from their headquarters, emphasising solidarity and collaboration among the divisions of the armed forces. The National Police also released a statement, reaffirming its commitment to the population.

On the night of 11 October, former Prime Minister Christian Louis Ntsay, whose office was terminated by Rajoelina on 29 September following the anti-government protests, and Mamy Ravatomanga (Malagasy businessman) were listed on a private flight out of Ivato International Airport (TNR). Unverified reports suggest that the president has fled the State House and may have also been on the flight, even though not officially listed.

These events follow protests on Saturday, 11 October, during which CAPSAT called on other military units to “refuse orders to shoot your friends” and “[d]o not obey orders from your superiors. Point your weapons at those who order you to fire on your comrades in arms because they will not take care of our families if we die”.

Soldiers were allegedly ordered to open fire on protesters, but instead reportedly joined them. Videos circulating on social media show additional military personnel participating in the protests on 11 October. Local media reported that there was an exchange of fire between CAPSAT troops and pro-government security forces in which a protester and a CAPSAT soldier appeared to be killed.

Conditions in Antananarivo and nationwide currently appear calm on 12 October, and there are no verified reports of clashes. Gatherings have been reported in Place du 13 Mai (13 May Square). While security forces are present, the atmosphere is reportedly peaceful. Speakers reportedly include CAPSAT officials.

One witness reported three people injured after shots were fired along a road to the CAPSAT barracks on 12 October. Other witnesses reported no signs of ongoing clashes. The current situation is highly dynamic and may change as events develop.

Prime Minister Ruphin Fortunat Zafisambo, a military general appointed by Rajoelina after he dismissed his predecessor, stated that the government is “fully ready to listen and engage in dialogue with all factions – youth, unions or the military”.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

This almost certainly constitutes the most significant threat to President Rajoelina’s rule since the disputed 2023 re-election, with the military unit that installed him in 2009 now attempting to oust him. While it is currently unclear to what extent CAPSAT has seized control of the government, the lack of statements from Rajoelina likely confirms reports that he has fled the country.

A previous coup took place in Madagascar in 2009 following a political crisis driven by tensions between President Marc Ravalomanana and opposition forces led by Rajoelina, then mayor of Antananarivo. Following months of protests and clashes, soldiers stormed and seized the Ambohitsorohitra Presidential Palace in March, forcing Ravalomanana to transfer power to a military council, after which the military junta formally handed over power to Rajoelina.

Following the coup, many of Ravalomanana’s supporters refused to accept the legitimacy of Rajoelina’s new government and staged demonstrations in the capital, to which security forces cracked down, resulting in at least 30 to 40 deaths, according to some estimates, in the immediate weeks after the coup. Prominent supporters of Ravalomanana were detained or forced into hiding, and journalists and media critics of the new leadership were censored or attacked. The situation was finally resolved after nine months, with a power-sharing agreement put in place in November 2009.

Another coup was attempted in November 2010 following factional divisions within the military; fighting broke out in Antananarivo, leaving several people dead before loyalist forces regained control.

Significant economic disruptions took place. Rajoelina announced a freeze of all mining contracts with foreign companies due to their alleged failure to pay the required fees and royalties. Major partners such as the World Bank, IMF, EU, and US, suspended aid or downgraded relations, causing foreign aid to drop by over 60 per cent between 2008 and 2010. The tourist sector, a major component of Madagascar’s economy, was severely hit. Hotels, tour operators, and related businesses experienced declines in revenue, triggering extensive layoffs from the hospitality industry and informal sectors that depended on tourism, deepening economic hardship and exacerbating poverty rates nationwide.

Following the ongoing coup, continued instability and protests are highly likely. Rajoelina has seen sporadic counterdemonstrations among supporters in Antananarivo, and these will likely be motivated to engage in pro-Rajoelina rallies in the capital. The military, which is currently attempting to restore order in the country, will highly likely respond to demonstrations with forceful crackdowns, which could trigger further unrest.

The broader protest movement, however, had Rajoelina’s resignation as one of its primary demands. There is a realistic possibility that the widespread Gen Z-led demonstrations will subside following the coup. CAPSAT’s apparent siding with protesters was almost certainly a calculated move to bring an end to the ongoing unrest. Furthermore, access to protest organiser Gen Z Madagascar’s Facebook page is currently restricted, something that could prevent widespread demonstrations from being organised.

However, the 2009 coup exacerbated economic difficulties, a spark for the current wave of unrest, and a further worsening of living conditions will likely increase the risk of unrest.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Madagascar

  • Shelter in place until the situation becomes clearer.
  • Avoid all major government or buildings, military barracks, universities, and police facilities. Reassess travel to Madagascar.
  • Allocate additional time for all road travel in Antananarivo and other major cities in Madagascar. Expect increased checkpoints by security forces.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of potential unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from security forces. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Heightened Security Risk
Ahead of October 7 Anniversary

blue background

Second Anniversary of October 7 Hamas Attack Raises Security Concerns

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 11:00 BST 06 OCTOBER 2025

The second anniversary of the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel that precipitated the ongoing conflict in Gaza falls on 7 October 2025. The first anniversary of the attack in 2024 coincided with several notable security developments. In Israel, the Yemen-based Houthis, Lebanon-based Hezbollah, and Hamas launched joint missile and rocket attacks targeting large cities, including Tel Aviv, injuring 12. Also in Israel, large-scale anti-government protests were held to mark the anniversary, with tens of thousands of people in attendance in Tel Aviv and other cities.

Protests were also recorded in several large Western European, Middle Eastern, and American cities. These continued in the days following the anniversary, and particularly on 13 October, the anniversary of the start of the Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip following the attack.

Several terrorism-related arrests were also carried out by authorities ahead of the first anniversary of the attack. For example, in Canada, a Pakistani citizen was arrested and subsequently extradited to the US for allegedly planning an attack on behalf of the Islamic State (IS) at a Jewish community centre in New York City on 7 October 2024. More recently, on 1 October 2025, German authorities stated that they had detained three suspected Hamas sympathisers in Berlin, for allegedly planning attacks on Jewish places of worship to coincide with the attack’s second anniversary.

In 2025, several large-scale protests have taken place in the days preceding the anniversary. These have been driven by the detention, in early October, of the vessels of the ‘Global Sumud Flotilla’ by the Israeli military as it attempted to reach Gaza. Violent demonstrations have been recorded in Italy, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Spain, with several cases of vandalism and direct action aimed at shutting down transport in large cities.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The anniversary of the 7 October attack will likely result in an increased risk of civil unrest and terrorism, particularly in Western Europe. This will highly likely be particularly severe in the countries that have had recent large-scale ‘Global Sumud Flotilla’ protests, particularly Italy, France, Spain, Germany and the UK, as protest organisers seek to maximise pressure on their governments and capitalise on the large attendance during the previous demonstrations.

Civil unrest is highly likely to consist of both large-scale demonstrations and small-scale targeted direct actions meant to affect local transport and services. The former are highly likely to target high-visibility areas like the vicinity of Israeli diplomatic offices, local government buildings, and the headquarters of companies perceived to be supporting the Israeli war effort.

A common tactic seen in previous protests is the blockade of main roadways, such as the ring roads that surround most large European cities. In terms of direct action, protesters may seek to carry out targeted acts of vandalism against private and public assets, and particularly company offices, or blockades of public transport hubs, such as train and metro stations and airports. While lower, the threat of more sophisticated acts aimed at causing disruptions, such as the targeting of electrical infrastructure or the use of drones to disrupt airport operations, cannot be ruled out.

The increased likelihood of terrorism on 7 October is driven by the date’s symbolic importance. In addition to the thwarted plot in Germany in early October 2025, there have been several foiled or successful terrorist attacks in Europe and North America, which have coincided with notable dates associated with Judaism or Israeli history. This most recently occurred with the 2 October Manchester synagogue stabbing attack on Yom Kippur, which killed two people and was perpetrated by a highly likely self-radicalised “lone wolf” inspired by extremist Islamist ideology.

While 7 October 2025 remains the most high-risk date for both civil unrest and terrorism, the threat is likely to remain elevated in the short term following the attack anniversary. Protests are highly likely to occur on the 10-13 October period, the first weekend following the anniversary and the second anniversary of the beginning of the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Moreover, ongoing significant developments in negotiations between Hamas and Israel are highly likely to serve as triggers for demonstrations.


Travel and Safety Guidance during Heightened Global Security Risk

  • Avoid the vicinity of diplomatic offices, government buildings, and places of worship due to higher threats of civil unrest and terrorism.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to depart.
  • If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and withdraw on foot.
  • Monitor local media for updates on planned protests and disruptions. Allocate additional time for road travel in large urban areas, including to airports.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from authorities. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Youth-Led Protests Escalate Across Morocco

blue background

Protests Spread Across Morocco Over Jobs, Healthcare, and Corruption

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 14:00 BST 02 OCTOBER 2025

Youth-led demonstrations have been ongoing since 27 September across several cities in Morocco, with demonstrators demanding better education, employment opportunities, and healthcare in response to a perceived failure of government funding. Protesters have chanted slogans including “we want hospitals, not stadiums” and “the people want an end to corruption”. The protests have been organised by an anonymous online youth group, calling itself “Gen Z 212”, which has mobilised supporters through social media platforms such as Discord, TikTok, and Instagram.

Demonstrations were initially relatively peaceful, occurring across Rabat, Marrakesh, and Casablanca. On 30 September, they escalated into clashes in Tiznit, Inzegane, Ait Amira, Oujda, and Temara. In Ait Amira and Inzegane, demonstrators set several police vehicles alight and burned down a bank while protesters threw stones at security forces in Tiznit and Oujda. Security forces responded forcefully, arresting nearly 200 people and deploying water cannon in several cities. Notably, in Oujda, a protester was hit by a police minivan, with footage of the incident being widely shared across social media.

Protests continued on 1 October in several locations, including Agadir, Rabat, Tetouan, Tangier, Casablanca, and Marrakesh. At least two people were killed in Lqliâa, near Agadir, after security forces fired on protesters with live ammunition when they allegedly attempted to raid the Royal Gendarmerie Centre. According to local reporting, protesters aimed to seize the weapons, ammunition, and equipment stored inside.

The government responded with a statement stating it “listens to and understands the social demands” of the protesters and was “ready to respond positively and responsibly” to find a solution.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

The protests, Morocco’s largest in years, come amid widespread youth frustrations with unemployment, education, and healthcare. According to the national statistics agency, Morocco has an unemployment rate of 12.8 per cent, with youth unemployment standing at 35.8 per cent, and 19 per cent among graduates. The protests have targeted the government, which is perceived as neglecting public services while investing billions of dollars into football infrastructure ahead of hosting the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations and co-hosting the 2030 FIFA World Cup.

The catalyst for the public anger was the deaths of eight pregnant women in the maternity ward of a public hospital in Agadir following caesarean operations in September, which had initially sparked smaller-scale protests. According to the World Health Organisation, Morocco has fewer than eight doctors per 10,000 people, far below the recommended 25.

The government’s appeal for dialogue is unlikely to appease protesters in the short term. The civil unrest likely constitutes a culmination of public anger after years of neglect in public services, a state of affairs unlikely to be quickly remedied. The government statement defended the security forces’ crackdown, praising the “balanced reaction of security authorities in line with relevant legal procedures”. This will highly likely further inflame the unrest, with the van ramming being widely shared across social media. The further deaths of protesters on 1 October will almost certainly add to protester anger, likely sustaining the civil unrest.

The Gen Z 212 movement, which emerged in the weeks prior, has rapidly gained traction across social media. The “212” almost certainly refers to Morocco’s country code, suggesting that organisers view themselves as part of a broader youth-driven movement. The demonstrations share key traits with other Gen Z-led protests in the region: mobilisation through online platforms, an explicitly leaderless structure, and a lack of formal ties to political parties.

These protests are highly likely inspired by similar youth movements, including the recent Nepalese unrest that overthrew the government, as well as ongoing mobilisation across Africa, notably in Kenya and, most recently, Madagascar. It is highly likely that the global surge in youth protests will lead to further civil unrest across many other African countries, where economic frustrations, such as unemployment and a rising cost of living, are similarly felt among the population, particularly Gen Z.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Morocco

  • Avoid all major government buildings, universities, and police facilities in Morocco. Reassess travel to Morocco.
  • Allocate additional time for all road travel in Rabat and other urban centres in Morocco.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from authorities. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.

Alert+

Protests in Madagascar Escalate Amid Power Cuts

blue background

Protests Erupt in Antananarivo Over Water and Electricity Cuts

SITUATION SUMMARY | Intelligence cut off: 10:30 BST 26 SEPTEMBER 2025

On 24 September, demonstrations broke out in Antananarivo over persistent water and electricity cuts, with outages often lasting more than 12 hours. Several groups of approximately 100 protesters gathered in multiple locations early in the day and attempted to reach the meeting point in the Ambohijatovo district. According to news reports and social media footage, the protests drew mostly young demonstrators, and no senior political figures were reported among the crowds. Protesters flew Malagasy flags alongside flags of the Straw Hat Jolly Roger from the Anime One Piece, a protest symbol increasingly used by youth-led protest movements globally, including recently in Nepal.

Demonstrations quickly escalated, with reports of fires and roadblocks in areas such as Analamahitsy, with protesters setting fire to several gondola transport stations and the Air Mauritius office. Looters targeted several shops, banks, and appliance stores, while the homes of three politicians allied with President Andry Rajoelina were also attacked. Unrest was also reported at the offices of the national water and electricity company.

Security forces deployed tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse protesters. Several journalists have reportedly been injured, and unconfirmed reports by the capital’s main hospital suggest that at least five people have been killed, all with gunshot wounds.

The protests have led to severe disruptions. Several schools in Antananarivo have closed for the remainder of the week. Approximately 100 students from a French high school were stranded on the evening of 25 September, forbidden from leaving due to security concerns. Access to Antananarivo International Airport (TNR / FMMI) was partially disrupted. While operations have not stopped, a flight from Paris to Antananarivo was diverted to Réunion Island.

A day before the protests, the local government banned demonstrations, citing concerns over civil unrest. A large gathering of security forces had been present in Antananarivo from 0530 local time, cordoning off certain areas. In response to the unrest, authorities imposed a nighttime curfew in Antananarivo, effective from 1900 25 September to 0500 26 September. According to unverified social media reports, the government is set to cut access to the internet from 1400, although this is unconfirmed and has been disputed.


INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS

Madagascar is one of the world’s poorest countries. According to a 2022 report from the World Bank, 75.2 per cent of the population lives below the poverty line. Poverty rates have remained high over the past decade, with rural poverty decreasing marginally while urban poverty has almost doubled. Many households suffer from overlapping deprivations in health, education, sanitation, and infrastructure.

​The poor economic situation is exacerbated by Madagascar’s high vulnerability to environmental risks, including cyclones and droughts. Damage from four tropical storms in 2022 was estimated to have cost as much as 5 per cent of Madagascar’s GDP.

The protests have been in line with other Gen Z-led protest movements in Africa. The movement gained momentum on social media, which was used to mobilise protests, coordinate meeting points, and share live updates.

Smaller demonstrations were also observed in provincial towns like Toamasina, Antsirabe, Toliara, and Antsiranana, likely reflecting wider discontent with the incumbent government.

The lack of political figures among the protesters highlights the grassroots nature of the movement. The use of Straw Hat Jolly Roger, which was widely used in the recent Nepalese protests which deposed the government, suggests a broader Gen Z-focused sentiment and the potential desire of a far more radical intent to likewise overthrow the government.

There is a realistic possibility that the government’s strict measures to curtail the protests will succeed. While protesters defied the protest ban on 25 September, the demonstrators were largely made up of relatively small groups. The authorities will likely impose internet and social media restrictions to stop protesters from being able to mobilise. This will also likely limit the circulation of footage of excessive force, which has the capacity to further fuel anti-government sentiment.

The government’s reaction to demonstrations, particularly security forces’ use of force, is highly likely to be perceived as excessive. If footage spreads across social media of security forces using live ammunition against protesters, this could significantly inflame demonstrations, despite a lack of leadership. The rhetoric of protest organisers indicates broader anti-government sentiment, which could escalate unrest motivated by more radical objectives.


Travel and Safety Guidance for Madagascar

  • Avoid all major government buildings, universities, and police facilities in Antananarivo. Reassess travel to Madagascar.
  • Allocate additional time for all road travel in Antananarivo and other major cities in Madagascar.
  • Plan for potential internet and communications disruptions; ensure you have emergency contacts saved on your phone and plan any potential travel routes. Emergency contacts should include the local authorities, medical facilities and any consular support. Ensure that mobile phones are charged in case of any loss of electricity.
  • Closely monitor announcements from local authorities and media sources for any developments that may severely impact the local security environment.
  • Avoid all areas of unrest due to incidental risks to bystanders. If caught in the unrest, travellers should move with the crowd until they find the nearest opportunity to escape. If in a vehicle, look to turn down the nearest road. If driving away is not an option, lock the vehicle and escape on foot.
  • Always follow all instructions and orders from security forces. Where possible, avoid areas of active unrest and remain in a secure accommodation.
  • Prolonged civil unrest can disrupt travel, especially if protesters begin targeting airports. Travellers should have contingency measures in place, including evacuation plans and reliable access to food, water and medication.
  • If caught in the vicinity of a security incident, seek shelter immediately and leave the area if safe to do so. Continue to adhere to all instructions issued by authorities and obey any security cordons in place.
  • If available, monitor your intelligence provider’s alerting platform and trusted local media for updates relevant to the unrest.